The continuous record carriers verify against.
See SpacesIQ →The carrier asks specific questions. CybrIQ produces specific answers.
Cyber-insurance carriers no longer accept attestation. Renewal, premium, and coverage breadth all depend on posture inputs the carrier verifies independently. The questions that move the most premium are the ones organizations answer the worst: what is on your network, how do you know, when did you last verify it. CybrIQ produces the artifact the carrier's risk model is asking for.
For: CFO, General Counsel, CISO, risk management, broker conversations.
Where the carrier conversation breaks down.
Posture questionnaires answered by attestation.
The carrier's questionnaire asks for asset inventory, network segmentation, and configuration management evidence. Most organizations attest. The carrier increasingly verifies and discounts.
Premium that does not reflect actual posture.
Strong programs paying high premiums because the underlying evidence is not credible. Weak programs getting reasonable premiums because nobody has tested the answers. CybrIQ levels the conversation.
Renewal cycles too short for reconstruction.
Renewal questionnaires arrive 60-90 days before expiration. The reconstruction project that produces a credible answer takes longer than that. CybrIQ produces the answer continuously.
Claim time, when posture is litigated.
After an incident, the carrier examines whether the posture inputs at policy inception were accurate. Continuous, dated, per-device evidence is the strongest defense in that conversation.
What changes when CybrIQ runs against this use case.
The CybrIQ products and services that ship the outcome.
Maps the underlying record to the carrier's questionnaire structure.
See ComplianceIQ →Translates the posture into the executive narrative the board, the carrier, and the underwriter all want to hear.
See AdvisoryIQ →Walk into the next renewal with answers, not attestations.
30 minutes. One environment. The artifact at the end is yours either way.